Reviewer Guidelines

Fusion of Multidisciplinary Research, An International Journal (FMR) relies on the expertise of reviewers to maintain high academic standards and ensure the quality of published research. The following guidelines outline the expectations and assessment criteria for reviewers:

  1. Timeliness:
    • Prompt Review: Reviewers are expected to complete their evaluations within the designated timeframe. Prompt reviews help maintain an efficient publication process.
  1. Confidentiality:
    • Privacy: Maintain the confidentiality of the manuscript and its content. Do not share or discuss the manuscript with others without prior permission from the editor.
  1. Objectivity and Fairness:
    • Impartial Assessment: Provide an objective and unbiased evaluation of the manuscript. Avoid personal comments or criticisms unrelated to the content or quality of the work.
    • Conflict of Interest: Disclose any potential conflicts of interest to the editor and recuse yourself if necessary.
  1. Assessment Criteria:
    • Originality and Innovation: Evaluate the novelty and originality of the research. Consider whether the study addresses a significant question or problem and contributes new knowledge or insights to the field.
    • Methodology: Assess the appropriateness and rigor of the research design and methods. Ensure that the methodology is clearly described, and the data is robust and reliable.
    • Results and Analysis: Examine the accuracy and clarity of the results. Ensure that the data is properly analyzed and that the conclusions are supported by the findings.
    • Clarity and Organization: Evaluate the clarity, coherence, and organization of the manuscript. Consider whether the writing is clear and concise and whether the manuscript is logically structured.
    • Literature Review: Evaluate the completeness and pertinence of the literature review, ensuring the manuscript accurately places the research within the current body of knowledge.
    • References: Check the accuracy and completeness of the references. Ensure that the citation style adheres to the journal’s guidelines (APA 7th edition or MLA).
  1. Constructive Feedback:
    • Detailed Comments: Provide specific and constructive feedback to help authors improve their work. Highlight strengths as well as areas for improvement.
    • Recommendations: Clearly state your recommendation (accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject) and provide a rationale for your decision.
  1. Ethical Considerations:
    • Plagiarism: Remain alert for any indications of plagiarism or unethical practices and promptly report any concerns to the editor.
    • Research Integrity: Ensure that the study adheres to ethical standards, including proper approvals for studies involving human or animal subjects.

By adhering to these guidelines, reviewers play a crucial role in upholding the integrity and quality of FMR. Your expertise and diligence are invaluable to the advancement of multidisciplinary research. For any questions or further assistance, please contact our editorial team at info@fusionproceedings.com.