Robotic Surgery: Review on Minimally Invasive Techniques
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63995/GQNC2594Keywords:
3D Visualization; Advanced Imaging; da Vinci Surgical System; Minimally Invasive; Precision; Robotic Surgery; Surgical OutcomesAbstract
Robotic surgery represents a significant advancement in minimally invasive techniques, offering enhanced precision, flexibility, and control compared to traditional methods. This review explores the evolution, benefits, and current applications of robotic surgery in various medical fields. Utilizing robotic systems such as the da Vinci Surgical System, surgeons can perform complex procedures through small incisions, resulting in reduced trauma, minimized blood loss, and faster recovery times for patients. Robotic surgery is particularly beneficial in fields like urology, gynecology, and cardiothoracic surgery, where precision is paramount. High-definition 3D visualization and articulated instruments allow surgeons to perform intricate movements with enhanced dexterity and accuracy. Additionally, the integration of advanced imaging technologies and real-time data analytics further improves surgical outcomes. Despite its advantages, robotic surgery presents challenges, including high costs, steep learning curves, and the need for specialized training. This review also addresses the ongoing development of more affordable and user-friendly robotic systems, as well as the potential for integrating artificial intelligence and machine learning to enhance surgical planning and execution. This abstract underscores the transformative impact of robotic surgery on minimally invasive techniques, highlighting its potential to improve patient outcomes, reduce surgical risks, and expand the capabilities of modern surgery.
Downloads
References
Chau D Vo, Bowen Jiang, Tej D Azad, Neil R Crawford, Ali Bydon, and Nicholas Theodore. “Robotic spine surgery: current state in minimally invasive surgery”. In: Global Spine Journal 10.2_suppl (2020), 34S–40S. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568219878131
Kamran Mohiuddin and Scott J Swanson. “Maximizing the benefit of minimally invasive surgery”. In: Journal of surgical oncology 108.5 (2013), pp. 315–319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23398
JP Ruurda, PC Van Der Sluis, S Van Der Horst, and R Van Hilllegersberg. “Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review”. In: Journal of surgical oncology 112.3 (2015), pp. 257–265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23922
Chin-Hsing Kuo, Jian S Dai, and Prokar Dasgupta. “Kinematic design considerations for minimally invasive surgical robots: an overview”. In: The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery 8.2 (2012), pp. 127–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.453
Olivier AJ Van der Meijden and Marlies P Schijven. “The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review”. In: Surgical endoscopy 23 (2009), pp. 1180–1190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0298-x
B Martin-Perez, GD Andrade-Ribeiro, L Hunter, and S Atallah. “A systematic review of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) from 2010 to 2013”. In: Techniques in coloproctology 18 (2014), pp. 775–788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1148-6
Jaydeep H Palep. “Robotic assisted minimally invasive surgery”. In: Journal of minimal access surgery 5.1 (2009), pp. 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.51313
Rooma Sinha, Madhumati Sanjay, B Rupa, and Samita Kumari. “Robotic surgery in gynecology”. In: Journal of minimal access surgery 11.1 (2015), pp. 50–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.147690
Azhar Hussain, Amina Malik, Mohammed U Halim, and Aslankhani Mohammad Ali. “The use of robotics in surgery: a review”. In: International journal of clinical practice 68.11 (2014), pp. 1376–1382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12492
Michele Tonutti, Daniel S Elson, Guang-Zhong Yang, Ara W Darzi, and Mikael H Sodergren. “The role of technology in minimally invasive surgery: state of the art, recent developments and future directions”. In: Postgraduate medical journal 93.1097 (2017), pp. 159–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134311
Anthony R Lanfranco, Andres E Castellanos, Jaydev P Desai, and William C Meyers. “Robotic surgery: a current perspective”. In: Annals of surgery 239.1 (2004), pp. 14–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000103020.19595.7d
Wu Lin, Tsai Huang, Hsu Chang, Chang Lee, and David Wang. “Unlocking the Potential of BCI: An extensive Guide to Neural Engineering”. In: Fusion of Multidisciplinary Research, An International Journal (FMR) 1.2 (2020), pp. 73–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63995/DLJN6827
Brian S Peters, Priscila R Armijo, Crystal Krause, Songita A Choudhury, and Dmitry Oleynikov. “Review of emerging surgical robotic technology”. In: Surgical endoscopy 32 (2018), pp. 1636–1655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6079-2
Francesco Paolo Prete, Angela Pezzolla, Fernando Prete, Mario Testini, Rinaldo Marzaioli, Alberto Patriti, Rosa Maria Jimenez-Rodriguez, Angela Gurrado, and Giovanni FM Strippoli. “Robotic versus laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials”. In: Annals of surgery 267.6 (2018), pp. 1034–1046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002523
Anand Kumar, Nirma Yadav, Shipra Singh, and Neha Chauhan. “Minimally invasive (endoscopic computer assisted) surgery: Technique and review”. In: Annals of maxillofacial surgery 6.2 (2016), pp. 159–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.200348
M Diana and JJBJoS Marescaux. “Robotic surgery”. In: Journal of British Surgery 102.2 (2015), e15–e28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9711
Valentina Vitiello, Su-Lin Lee, Thomas P Cundy, and Guang-Zhong Yang. “Emerging robotic platforms for minimally invasive surgery”. In: IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering 6 (2012), pp. 111–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2012.2236311
F Cepolina and RC Michelini. “Review of robotic fixtures for minimally invasive surgery”. In: The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery 1.1 (2004), pp. 43–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.5
Rajiv B Gala, Rebecca Margulies, Adam Steinberg, Miles Murphy, James Lukban, Peter Jeppson, Sarit Aschkenazi, Cedric Olivera, Mary South, Lior Lowenstein, et al. “Systematic review of robotic surgery in gynecology: robotic techniques compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy”. In: Journal of minimally invasive gynecology 21.3 (2014), pp. 353–361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2013.11.010
KH Fuchs. “Minimally invasive surgery”. In: Endoscopy 34.02 (2002), pp. 154–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-19857
Chin-Hsing Kuo and Jian S Dai. “Robotics for minimally invasive surgery: a historical review from the perspective of kinematics”. In: International Symposium on History of Machines and Mechanisms: Proceedings of HMM 2008. Springer. 2009, pp. 337–354.
Ara Darzi and Yaron Munz. “The impact of minimally invasive surgical techniques”. In: Annu. Rev. Med. 55 (2004), pp. 223–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.med.55.091902.105248
Michael J Mack. “Minimally invasive and robotic surgery”. In: Jama 285.5 (2001), pp. 568–572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.5.568
Olatunji Mumini Omisore, Shipeng Han, Jing Xiong, Hui Li, Zheng Li, and Lei Wang. “A review on flexible robotic systems for minimally invasive surgery”. In: IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 52.1 (2020), pp. 631–644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2020.3026174
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© The Author(s). Published by Fusion of Multidisciplinary Research, An International Journal (FMR), Netherlands.
This is an open-access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.