The Effects of Political Polarization on Financial Decision Making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63995/SIVB6153Keywords:
Bias; Decision Making; Financial Markets; Investor Behavior; Partisanship; Political Polarization; Risk PerceptionAbstract
Political polarization significantly impacts financial decision-making, affecting both individual investors and broader financial markets. As political divisions deepen, individuals' financial choices increasingly reflect their partisan beliefs, often leading to biased investment behaviors. Investors may favor companies or sectors perceived as aligned with their political views, potentially overlooking objective financial metrics. This bias can result in suboptimal investment portfolios, higher risk exposure, and lower returns. Polarization also influences market sentiment and volatility. Politically charged events, such as elections or policy announcements, can lead to heightened uncertainty and market fluctuations. Investors react not only to the economic implications of policies but also to their alignment with personal beliefs, exacerbating market instability. For example, differing expectations about regulatory changes can cause significant swings in stock prices, particularly in industries like healthcare, energy, and finance. Furthermore, political polarization affects policymakers' ability to implement consistent economic policies, creating an unpredictable regulatory environment. This uncertainty can deter long-term investments and hinder economic growth. Companies may delay expansion or innovation plans due to unclear future regulations, impacting overall market performance. Understanding the effects of political polarization on financial decision-making is crucial for developing strategies to mitigate its impact. Financial advisors and investors must navigate these biases and uncertainties to make more informed, objective decisions.
Downloads
References
Morris P Fiorina, Samuel A Abrams, and Jeremy C Pope. “Polarization in the American public: Misconceptions and misreadings”. In: The Journal of Politics 70.2 (2008), pp. 556–560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002238160808050X
James N Druckman, Erik Peterson, and Rune Slothuus. “How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation”. In: American political science review 107.1 (2013), pp. 57–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000500
Joshua A Tucker, Andrew Guess, Pablo Barberá, Cristian Vaccari, Alexandra Siegel, Sergey Sanovich, Denis Stukal, and Brendan Nyhan. “Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature”. In: Political polarization, and political disinformation: a review of the scientific literature (March 19, 2018) (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3144139
Friedrich Stephanie and Louisa Karl. “Incorporating Renewable Energy Systems for a New Era of Grid Stability”. In: Fusion of Multidisciplinary Research, An International Journal (FMR) 1.1 (2020), pp. 37–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63995/UVPR3703
Pietro Ortoleva and Erik Snowberg. “Overconfidence in political behavior”. In: American Economic Review 105.2 (2015), pp. 504–535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130921
Philip Keefer and Stephen Knack. “Polarization, politics and property rights: Links between inequality and growth”. In: Public choice 111.1 (2002), pp. 127–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015168000336
Shanto Iyengar and Sean J Westwood. “Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization”. In: American journal of political science 59.3 (2015), pp. 690–707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12152
Wu Lin, Tsai Huang, Hsu Chang, Chang Lee, and David Wang. “Unlocking the Potential of BCI: An extensive Guide to Neural Engineering”. In: Fusion of Multidisciplinary Research, An International Journal (FMR) 1.2 (2020), pp. 73–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63995/DLJN6827
Jaejoon Woo. “Economic, political, and institutional determinants of public deficits”. In: Journal of public economics 87.3-4 (2003), pp. 387–426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00143-8
Shanto Iyengar, Yphtach Lelkes, Matthew Levendusky, Neil Malhotra, and Sean J Westwood. “The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States”. In: Annual review of political science 22.1 (2019), pp. 129–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
Justin Farrell. “Corporate funding and ideological polarization about climate change”. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113.1 (2016), pp. 92–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509433112
Matthew A Baum and Tim Groeling. “New media and the polarization of American political discourse”. In: Political Communication 25.4 (2008), pp. 345–365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600802426965
Antonio Lorenza, Gabriella Caterina, and Bianca Isabella. “Machine Learning Techniques for Accurate Prediction of Proteins Function”. In: Fusion of Multidisciplinary Research, An International Journal (FMR) 1.2 (2020), pp. 85–96.
Emily Kubin and Christian Von Sikorski. “The role of (social) media in political polarization: a systematic review”. In: Annals of the International Communication Association 45.3 (2021), pp. 188–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1976070
Delia Baldassarri and Andrew Gelman. “Partisans without constraint: Political polarization and trends in American public opinion”. In: American Journal of Sociology 114.2 (2008), pp. 408–446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/590649
Manuel André, João Margarida, Heitor Garcia, and Augusto Dante. “Complexities of Blockchain Technology and Distributed Ledger Technologies: A Detailed Inspection”. In: Fusion of Multidisciplinary Research, An International Journal (FMR) 2.1 (2021), pp. 164–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63995/PMDT9612
Joseph Funderburke. “National Security and Political Polarization”. PhD thesis. University of Central Florida, 2019.
Zoe Oxley. “Framing and political decision making: An overview”. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1250
Barbara Sinclair. Party wars: Polarization and the politics of national policy making. Vol. 10. University of Oklahoma Press, 2012.
Małgorzata Cognominal, Krystyna Patronymic, and Agnieszka Wańkowicz. “Evolving Field of Autonomous Mobile Robotics. Technological Advances and Applications”. In: Fusion of Multidisciplinary Research, An International Journal (FMR) 2.2 (2021), pp. 189–200.
Jennifer McCoy, Tahmina Rahman, and Murat Somer. “Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: Common patterns, dynamics, and pernicious consequences for democratic polities”. In: American Behavioral Scientist 62.1 (2018), pp. 16–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218759576
Marc J Hetherington. “Putting polarization in perspective”. In: British Journal of Political Science 39.2 (2009), pp. 413–448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000501
Thomas Carothers and Andrew O’Donohue. Democracies divided: The global challenge of political polarization. Brookings Institution Press, 2019.
Blenda Johansson, Elvira Eriksson, Nellie Berglund, and Ingrid Lindgren. “Robotic Surgery: Review on Minimally Invasive Techniques”. In: Fusion of Multidisciplinary Research, An International Journal (FMR) 2.2 (2021), pp. 201–210.
Paula McAvoy and Diana Hess. “Classroom deliberation in an era of political polarization”. In: Curriculum Inquiry 43.1 (2013), pp. 14–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/curi.12000
Ro’ee Levy. “Social media, news consumption, and polarization: Evidence from a field experiment”. In: American economic review 111.3 (2021), pp. 831–870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20191777
Jeff Stonecash. Diverging parties: Social change, realignment, and party polarization. Routledge, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429500961
Dominic Spohr. “Fake news and ideological polarization: Filter bubbles and selective exposure on social media”. In: Business information review 34.3 (2017), pp. 150–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382117722446
Josef Baumgartner, Alexandra Schneider, Ulugbek Zhenis, Franz Jager, and Josef Winkler. “Mastering Neural Network Prediction for Enhanced System Reliability”. In: Fusion of Multidisciplinary Research, An International Journal (FMR) 3.1 (2022), pp. 261–274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63995/RVZF7165
Christopher McConnell, Yotam Margalit, Neil Malhotra, and Matthew Levendusky. “The economic consequences of partisanship in a polarized era”. In: American Journal of Political Science 62.1 (2018), pp. 5–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12330
Narjess Boubakri, Sattar A Mansi, and Walid Saffar. “Political institutions, connectedness, and corporate risk-taking”. In: Journal of international business studies 44 (2013), pp. 195–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.2
Nolan McCarty, Keith T Poole, and Howard Rosenthal. Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. mit Press, 2016.
Atif Mian, Amir Sufi, and Francesco Trebbi. “Resolving debt overhang: Political constraints in the aftermath of financial crises”. In: American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 6.2 (2014), pp. 1–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.6.2.1
Morris P Fiorina and Samuel J Abrams. “Political polarization in the American public”. In: Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 11.1 (2008), pp. 563–588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836
Marc Heylen, Patrick Bossuyt, Philippe Provoost, David Borremans, and Christine Rampelberg. “Making Antennas for 6G”. In: Fusion of Multidisciplinary Research, An International Journal (FMR) 3.1 (2022), pp. 235–247.
Sean M Theriault. Party polarization in congress. Cambridge University Press, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790652
Yotam Shmargad and Samara Klar. “Using Online Experiments to Study Political Decision Making”. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.924
Marc J Hetherington and Jonathan D Weiler. Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. Cambridge University Press, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802331
William Coetzee, Reiner Khumalo, Brendan Le Roux, and Ebrahim Van Wyk. “Sickle Cell Disease: Causes, Symptoms, and Treatment”. In: Fusion of Multidisciplinary Research, An International Journal (FMR) 3.1 (2022), pp. 275–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63995/KRPR3602
Adam Bonica, Nolan McCarty, Keith T Poole, and Howard Rosenthal. “Why hasn’t democracy slowed rising inequality?” In: Journal of Economic Perspectives 27.3 (2013), pp. 103–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.27.3.103
James E Alt and David Dreyer Lassen. “Transparency, political polarization, and political budget cycles in OECD countries”. In: American Journal of Political Science 50.3 (2006), pp. 530–550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00200.x
Michael Barber, Nolan McCarty, Jane Mansbridge, and Cathie Jo Martin. “Causes and consequences of polarization”. In: Political negotiation: A handbook 37 (2015), pp. 39–43.
Markus Prior. “Media and political polarization”. In: Annual review of political science 16.1 (2013), pp. 101–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242
Valdemar Johansen, Malthe Rasmussen, and Arne Knudsen. “Dielectric Constants and Their Role in Plasma Simulation”. In: Fusion of Multidisciplinary Research, An International Journal (FMR) 3.1 (2022), pp. 248–260.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© The Author(s). Published by Fusion of Multidisciplinary Research, An International Journal (FMR), Netherlands.
This is an open-access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.