Environmental Modeling Breakthrough: New Mathematical Solutions for Climate Impact Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63995/EKVE6795Keywords:
Climate Impact Assessment, Environmental Modeling, Mathematical Solutions, Predictive Analysis, Sustainability ScienceAbstract
Over the past 20 years, China’s construction industry is responsible for 64.6 percent of all China’s total emission from 1991 to 2010, and its growth rate per year averages 5.7 percent. These figures are ominous enough to underscore the importance of environmental modeling needed for the determination and management of climate impact in the various industries. Breakthroughs in mathematical models are replacing our current way of assessing environmental impacts. Importantly, when used for the analysis of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of the iron ore opencast mines of Iran, these models sought to identify potential unsustainability concerns in EIA that might have been overlooked. Additionally, such advanced modeling tools are supporting us in tackling severe environmental issues, including the carbon footprint and the assessment of air pollution. In this paper we discuss the newest evolution in environmental modeling, in particular mathematical solutions that are big changes in the future of climate impact assessments. The technical inputs of this analysis include innovative optimization techniques, practical engineering applications and sustainable technologies to create the future of environmental engineering. Using this systematic evaluation, we will understand how these mathematical approaches are delivering more fact based and actionable insights for making environmental decisions.
Downloads
References
[1] Bakenaz A Zeidan. “Mathematical modeling of environmental problems”. In: Environmental science and engineering, instrument, modeling and analysis 7 (2017), pp. 422–461.
[2] Jean-Francois Mercure, Hector Pollitt, Neil R Edwards, Philip B Holden, Unnada Chewpreecha, Pablo Salas, Aileen Lam, Florian Knobloch, and Jorge E Vinuales. “Environmental impact assessment for climate change policy with the simulation-based integrated assessment model E3ME-FTT-GENIE”. In: Energy strategy reviews 20 (2018), pp. 195–208.
[3] Olivier Bahn. “The contribution of mathematical models to climate policy design: a researcher’s perspective”. In: Environmental Modeling & Assessment 23.6 (2018), pp. 691–701.
[4] Marc Heylen, Patrick Bossuyt, Philippe Provoost, David Borremans, and Christine Rampelberg. “Making Antennas for 6G”. In: Fusion of Multidisciplinary Research, An International Journal (FMR) 3.1 (2022), pp. 235–247.
[5] Joseph Andrew Clarke and Jan LM Hensen. “Integrated building performance simulation: Progress, prospects and requirements”. In: Building and Environment 91 (2015), pp. 294–306.
[6] Valentina Bosetti, Enrica De Cian, Alessandra Sgobbi, and Massimo Tavoni. “The 2008 WITCH model: new model features and baseline”. In: (2009).
[7] Marjolein BA Van Asselt and Jan Rotmans. “Uncertainty in integrated assessment modelling”. In: Climatic change 54.1 (2002), pp. 75–105.
[8] Guilherme Marques, Francisco Gonçalves, Marco Gomes, and Beatriz Pereira. “Observations Biomedicals in Veterinary Pathobiology”. In: Fusion of Multidisciplinary Research, An International Journal (FMR) 3.2 (2022), pp. 316–328.
[9] Kai Fang, Reinout Heijungs, and Geert R De Snoo. “Understanding the complementary linkages between environmental footprints and planetary boundaries in a footprint–boundary environmental sustainability assessment framework”. In: Ecological Economics 114 (2015), pp. 218–226.
[10] Avinash Shankar Rammohan Subramanian, Truls Gundersen, and Thomas Alan Adams. “Modeling and simulation of energy systems: A review”. In: Processes 6.12 (2018), p. 238.
[11] Alan Geoffrey Wilson. “Land-use/transport interaction models: Past and future”. In: Journal of transport economics and policy (1998), pp. 3–26.
[12] Peter Bauer, Alan Thorpe, and Gilbert Brunet. “The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction”. In: Nature 525.7567 (2015), pp. 47–55.
[13] Shira Rubin, Daniel Mizrachi, Noam Friedman, Hila Edri, and Tamar Golan. “The World of Advanced Thin Films: Design, Fabrication, and Applications”. In: Fusion of Multidisciplinary Research, An International Journal (FMR) 4.1 (2023), pp. 393–406.
[14] Claudio Paniconi and Mario Putti. “Physically based modeling in catchment hydrology at 50: Survey and outlook”. In: Water Resources Research 51.9 (2015), pp. 7090–7129.
[15] Johanna Jacomina Heymans, Marta Coll, Jason S Link, Steven Mackinson, Jeroen Steenbeek, Carl Walters, and Villy Christensen. “Best practice in Ecopath with Ecosim food-web models for ecosystem-based management”. In: Ecological modelling 331 (2016), pp. 173–184.
[16] Marcela Andrea Espina de Franco, Cassandra Bonfante de Carvalho, Mariana Marques Bonetto, Rafael de Pelegrini Soares, and Liliana Amaral Féris. “Diclofenac removal from water by adsorption using activated carbon in batch mode and fixed-bed column: isotherms, thermodynamic study and breakthrough curves modeling”. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 181 (2018), pp. 145–154.
[17] Pollyanna Obi, Kingsley Eze, and Raphael Balogun. “Competition in Marketing: A Deep Dive into Advertising Rivalries”. In: Fusion of Multidisciplinary Research, An International Journal (FMR) 4.2 (2023), pp. 471–482.
[18] David Giraldi, M de Michieli Vitturi, and Renato Iannelli. “FITOVERT: a dynamic numerical model of subsurface vertical flow constructed wetlands”. In: Environmental Modelling & Software 25.5 (2010), pp. 633–640.
[19] James E Bailey. “Mathematical modeling and analysis in biochemical engineering: past accomplishments and future opportunities”. In: Biotechnology progress 14.1 (1998), pp. 8–20.
[20] Richard A Stillman, Steven F Railsback, Jarl Giske, UTA Berger, and Volker Grimm. “Making predictions in a changing world: the benefits of individual-based ecology”. In: BioScience 65.2 (2015), pp. 140–150.
[21] Natalia Garavano, Francisca Sadosky, and Facundo Bulgheroni. “Protein Structure Prediction Tools and Computational Approaches”. In: Fusion of Multidisciplinary Research, An International Journal (FMR) 4.2 (2023), pp. 498–509.
[22] Michelle Rene Kirby. A methodology for technology identification, evaluation, and selection in conceptual and preliminary aircraft design. Georgia Institute of Technology, 2001.
[23] Robert C Merton. “Influence of mathematical models in finance on practice: past, present and future”. In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Physical and Engineering Sciences 347.1684 (1994), pp. 451–463.
[24] Jerry Wind and Vijay Mahajan. Issues and opportunities in new product development: An introduction to the special issue. 1997.
[25] Klaus Hasselmann, Susanne Hasselmann, Ralf Giering, Victor Ocana, and HV Storch. “Sensitivity study of optimal CO2 emission paths using a simplified structural integrated assessment model (SIAM)”. In: Climatic Change 37.2 (1997), pp. 345–386.
[26] Kanokwan Chakrii, Pattanapong Saelim, and Nattapong Bui. “The Complete Manual on DualPurpose Electrocatalysts”. In: Fusion of Multidisciplinary Research, An International Journal (FMR) 5.1 (2024), pp. 510–528.
[27] Huadong Guo. “Big Earth data: A new frontier in Earth and information sciences”. In: Big Earth Data 1.1-2 (2017), pp. 4–20.
[28] Jean-Charles Hourcade, Mark Jaccard, Chris Bataille, and Frédéric Ghersif. “Hybrid modeling: new answers to old challenges introduction to the special issue of the energy journal”. In: The Energy Journal 27.2_suppl (2006), pp. 1–11.
[29] Ma-Lin Song, Ron Fisher, Jian-Lin Wang, and Lian-Biao Cui. “Environmental performance evaluation with big data: Theories and methods”. In: Annals of Operations Research 270.1 (2018), pp. 459–472.
[30] Manuela Horvat, Valentina Novak, Frederik Antunovic, and Dario Blazevic. “Reflecting on the Mutation Rate Variability in Plant Genomes: An In-depth Analysis”. In: Fusion of Multidisciplinary Research, An International Journal (FMR) 5.1 (2024), pp. 556–567.
[31] Zhe Xu, Jian-guo Cai, and Bing-cai Pan. “Mathematically modeling fixed-bed adsorption in aqueous systems”. In: Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A 14.3 (2013), pp. 155–176.
[32] National Research Council, Oversight Commission for the Committee on Grand Challenges in Environmental Sciences, and Committee on Grand Challenges in Environmental Sciences. Grand challenges in environmental sciences. National Academies Press, 2001.
[33] Matthew R Evans, Mike Bithell, Stephen J Cornell, Sasha RX Dall, Sandra Díaz, Stephen Emmott, Bruno Ernande, Volker Grimm, David J Hodgson, Simon L Lewis, et al. “Predictive systems ecology”. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280.1771 (2013), p. 20131452.
[34] Hartmut Bossel. Systems and models: complexity, dynamics, evolution, sustainability. BoD–Books on Demand, 2007.
[35] Stewart Cohen, David Demeritt, John Robinson, and Dale Rothman. “Climate change and sustainable development: towards dialogue”. In: Global environmental change 8.4 (1998), pp. 341–371.
[36] James R Mihelcic and Julie B Zimmerman. Environmental engineering: Fundamentals, sustainability, design. John wiley & sons, 2021.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© The Author(s). Published by Fusion of Multidisciplinary Research, An International Journal (FMR), Netherlands.
This is an open-access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.